These are features playing right now.
These are features playing right now.
Runtime:
1 hr. 50 min.
Rating:
R sexual content, nudity, violence and language
Cast:
Jason Statham, Saffron Burrows, Stephen Campbell Moore, Daniel Mays, James
Faulkner
Director:
Roger Donaldson
Genres:
Docudrama, Crime Comedy, Caper, Crime
Yes I’m finally
getting around to this. Sorry. Been working on a sitcom and generally keeping a
roof over my head. But this flick has stuck in my mind ever since I saw it over
a month ago. So here is my review.
I know
Hollywood was hard pressed to find material for Jason Statham that would top The
Transporter 2 and In
The Name of The King,
but I think they may have, yes perhaps, succeeded.
Come on who
are we kidding? Watching Jason Statham take a dump would top either of those
films!
The truth is The
Bank Job is not only
Jason Statham’s best film to date, it is one of the most entertaining films I
have seen this year.
Inspired by
real events, which happened in the 1970s, Jason plays Terry, a low level
sometimes thief who is in debt and runs a car dealership. Terry is in love with
his new family and has pretty much left his shady dealings behind. But when Martine (Saffron Burrows), a
beautiful model from his old neighborhood, offers him a lead on a foolproof
bank hit on London's Baker Street, Terry recognizes the opportunity of a
lifetime.
Martine has
targeted a roomful of safe deposit boxes worth millions in cash and jewelry.
Simple enough. What Terry and his crew don’t realize is that they have stepped
into one big pile of British Royal dung.
The boxes also
contain a treasure trove of dirty secrets - secrets that will thrust Terry and
co. into a deadly web of corruption and illicit scandal that spans London's
criminal underworld, the highest echelons of the British government, and the
Royal Family itself.
Honestly, I’ve
never been a big fan of heist movies, but this one may turn me onto them. While
slow in the beginning, I enjoyed the methodical approach director Roger
Donaldson used with the material. We spend time getting to know each of Terry’s
cohorts, so when the time comes that they may go down, we feel some sort of
empathy for them. It makes us laugh and root for them.
But when the
action comes, it’s fast and furious. I am actually a Jason Statham fan from
when I saw him in The Transporter. Interestingly, he is very restrained here…until the end when he
lays down some Transporter-worthy ass kickings on the villains.
And speaking of
the villains, how are they? Really threatening. Smarmy, making you giddy when
they finally do get what’s coming to them.
I only knew
Saffron Burrows from Boston Legal…I lust at her right along with Denny Crane and Alan Shore. Here
she amps up the sexiness (if that’s possible) even more, making me a lusty
popcorn muncher.
Other aspects
that stand out are the cinematography by
J.Peter Robinson and the score by Gavin Bocquet. Both feel straight out
of my favorite decade of movie making – the 1970s.
It’s interesting
to note (especially in this era of Elliot Spitzer) how the government tries to
protect the ruling class’ sexual forays in1970s Britain. Where today, we’re so
ready to hang our leaders out to dry the moment they misstep.
How true The
Bank Job is to the
original is really of no matter, it’s an extremely entertaining two hours
filled with twists and turns, some predictable, some outrageous, but all fun.
Three and a
Half Ball Point Pens
Runtime:
1 hr. 25 min.
Rating:
PG-13 crude and sexual content, comic violence, drug references and language
Cast:
Drake Bell, Sara Paxton, Christopher McDonald, Pamela Anderson, Tracy Morgan,
Regina Hall
Director:
Craig Mazin
Genres:
Parody/Spoof, Comic-Book Superhero Film, Absurd Comedy, Comedy
So
let me get this straight - after three Spider-man movies, three X-Men films, Superman
Returns,
Batman Begins, two Fantastic Four movies, Daredevil, The Hulk the guys in Hollywood
finally decided now would be a good time to spoof them?
Don’t
get me wrong I’m not hating on the new Superhero Movie, but just questioning
its timing a little.
I
think it’s especially hard to spoof a good superhero feature these days when so
many films in the genre are so bad. Talk to me about Catwoman, Elecktra,
Ghost Rider.
When
you’re judging a film like Superhero Movie you can’t really go by the usual
parameters though. Things like plot, acting, dialogue go right out the door.
And are replaced by jokes.
Jokes
of all kinds. Verbal jokes. Physical jokes. Runing jokes. Crude jokes.
Especially the crude jokes!
In
that respect, Superhero Movie does deliver the goods. But since this is a
review, just for review’s sake I’ll briefly go over the plot. What little there
is.
After
being bitten by a genetically altered dragonfly, high school loser Rick
Riker (played by Drake and Josh’s
Drake Bell) develops superhuman abilities like incredible strength and armored
skin. Rick decides to use his new powers for good and becomes a costumed crime fighter
known as "The Dragonfly." However, standing in the way of his destiny
is the villainous Lou Landers. After an experiment gone wrong, Lou develops the
power to steal a person's life force and in a dastardly quest for immortality
becomes the super villain, "The Hourglass."
Beat
wise, this film follows the original Spider-man pretty much beat for
beat. And of course, Spider-man owes a lot to Richard Donner’s Superman.
All
of the actors are fine in this sort of piece. Drake is from the over-the-top school
from his TV series. And Pam Anderson’s breasts are on full display in a fun
send-up of the X-Men and Fantastic Four. And who can argue about seeing Pam’s
glorious boobage?
So
back to the jokes. Yes some are expected. The farting…oh the farting. Some did
catch me off guard and make me howl though. And some were completely
inappropriate for my daughters – small penis references, Drake’s dragonfly-like
hands sticking to a teacher’s breasts etc. But how can you fault a movie that has Leslie Nielson still
doing his Leslie Nielson antics. Good for you Methuselah!
Superhero
Movie
is not a must-see. It will never break my top ten or twenty for that matter,
but if you need a good laugh, you can be guaranteed to find some here.
Three
Ball Point Pens
Runtime: 1 hr. 28 min.
Rating:
G
Cast: Jim Carrey, Steve Carell,
Carol Burnett, Will Arnett, Seth Rogen, Isla Fisher, Jonah Hill, Amy Poehler,
Charles Osgood
Director: Jimmy Heywood and Steve
Martino
Written by: Ken Daurio & Cinco
Paul
Genres:
Family-Oriented Adventure, Children's/Family
I haven’t had
much luck with Dr. Seuss adaptations at the theater. Yes, they make money, but
somehow either the books are always better or the original adapted versions.
Take for
instance, The Grinch.
The classic cartoon is nothing less than perfect, which can probably explain my
100 or so viewings of the classic. Whereas, the movie, with Jim Carrey felt
long and genuinely not funny.
The same can
be said about The Cat in The Hat with the increasingly annoying Mike Myers. Again, long. Again,
not funny. And Myers’ make up looked like something that escaped from a toxic
waste dump.
So I went into
the new Horton Hears a Who with not really trepidation - but an “I don’t care” attitude.
The girls wanted to see it. And who am I to argue with my girls. I did expect
it to be bad though. Not College Road Trip bad, but damn near close.
I’m happy to
report back, that while not perfect, the new Horton Hears a Who comes the closest to capturing the
spirit of the source material.
Horton
is the story of an imaginative elephant who discovers Whoville lives on
a tiny speck…on top of a clover. Once Horton shares this find with the rest of
his jungle society he is ridiculed, especially by the skeptical Kangaroo. As
voiced by Carol Burnett she reminded me of every self-righteous, know-it-all,
nosy woman that tries to run the Cul-De-Sac in the ‘burbs. She is small-minded,
doesn’t look outside of her world
and chastises anyone who does. Actually, she will set out to destroy anyone who
doesn’t think like her. Where have we seen that before?
Horton ignores
her warnings and takes it upon himself to protect the little people of
Whoville. Meanwhile down in Whoville, The Mayor (voiced by Steve Carrell) comes
to the realization, through a series of tremors, cloud patterns and the ground
tilting, that there may be more out there than the world of Whoville.
He too, is
scoffed by the town council who consider him a puppet more than a leader.
Through some
sort of (it’s alluded too as possibly) divine intervention/coincidence, Horton
and The Mayor come across each other. Both are invisible to each other, but
each believes in the other’s existence.
The rest of
the pic follows the two as they go through hell to prove to their respective
societies that the other exists.
No one
believes them…until possible disaster happens. Isn’t that the way it always is?
I enjoyed Horton. For me, it’s the best feature
adaptation of Seuss. Jim Carrey voices Horton with imagination, sympathy and a
certain selflessness that I responded to. There is a wide-eyed innocence that
he brings to the elephant. Yes, the usual Carrey ramblings are there – not sure
the kids will get the Henry Kissinger reference – which the kidswill also smile
at.
Steve Carrell
is also pretty good as The Mayor. He brings a yearning to his portrayal of the
mayor – who pines to join his other great mayor/relatives – which most adults
can relate to. One complaint – please Hollywood stop thinking it is funny to
have white guys try to be cool by sounding black.
It’s not
funny.
I also thought
the animation was decent. Overall, it is colorful, fun and captures the book.
It made me believe that Seuss books should not be live action, but some sort of
animation. Ooo that rhymed. I really enjoyed one sequence where the animation
turned to anime. Very fun.
The themes of
faith and selflessness come through loud and clear. When the Who’s cry out in
desperation, “we’re here,” my heart actually warmed.
If you have 90
minutes and want to take your kids to something truly entertaining, give Horton a try. Like an elephant, I think don’t
you’ll forget it.
Three Ball Point Pens
Runtime:
1 hr. 23 min.
Rating:
G
Cast:
Raven Symone, Martin Lawrence, Donny Osmond, Will Sasso
Director:
Roger Kumble
Genres:
Road Movie, Comedy, Coming-of-Age, Domestic Comedy, Family-Oriented Comedy
So where do you start when the best acting in a film is done by a pork belly pig?
I really don’t know. Obviously I am talking the about the over-the-top, the overly acted, the overly bad, beyond formulaic College Road Trip. I have no doubt this will end up on my worst list.
College Road Trip is the story of disturbingly overprotective father/police chief James Porter, played by Martin Lawrence, who can’t let go of his daughter Melanie, played by Raven-Symone. James keeps alphabetized videos from the time she was a baby to the present. And he has even decided Melanie will attend Northwestern no matter what.
Of course Melanie has other ideas. An overachieving high school senior with Georgetown in her scope, Melanie wants to prove her independence to her dad.
When an opportunity presents itself for Melanie to visit the admissions board at Georgetown, she jumps at the chance to ride off with her girlfriends on a college road trip - stopping off in Pittsburgh to visit The University of Pitt as well. Of course Lawrence’s James puts the kibosh to the whole idea and decides to take Melanie himself.
Insert predictable, horribly unfunny set pieces. One after the boring other.
Directed by Roger Kumble, College Road Trip is a by the numbers, corporate and very mechanical so-called family film. I got more family feeling out of the recent Be Kind Rewind than this piece of junk. It feels like a collaboration of filmmakers, number crunchers and focus groups.
I can see all three groups huddled around a conference room table, brainstorming.
“So Melanie and James have missed their flight.”
“So what do they do?”
“There’s a diving team…get it?... heading to their private plane. Let’s have Mel and James mistake them for divers instead of…SKY DIVERS!”
“Brilliant. Do that! Yes. Let’s get lattes and go to yoga.”
What the hell? I can’t tell you how NOT funny that scene was. Oh and of course they are going to let the two – untrained skydivers – jump out of a plane.
Yeah, brilliant.
Look I think Martin Lawrence is a funny guy. There are plenty of films I enjoyed him in…even Bad Boys 2…but he plays the role of James Porter with an almost creepy, incestuous feel. He peeks through windows, as his daughter is getting ready to drive off with her girlfriends. Yuck. Particularly creepy is a scene where James sneaks across Pitt’s campus, climbs a ladder up to a sorority dorm room and spies on Raven and co. If that weren’t enough, he ends up sleeping underneath her bed while she and a girlfriend talk about lip-gloss.
Raven-Symone plays Melanie as if she is still on That’s So Raven. Her performance is over the top and, honestly, really bad. Hey, Raven, I was upset when you passed on Queen B. Um. Okay. I’m glad I got to see you in this first. In fact, I dare say I never want to see Raven-Symone act again. Yes she’s that bad. And she can barely sing. Poor Frankie Smith has to have her re-do his 80’s rap classic The Double Dutch Bus. The Double-Dutch Bus!?!
Oh should I mention the rest of the cast? Hmm, let’s see the focus group and the number crunchers say we need an ultra-white version of James and Melanie…
“How about Donny and Marie?”
“Hmm, Marie is too old. But we love Donny. Sign him!”
Donny Osmond, if possible, is even more over the top and possibly creepier (think the original The Stepfather) than James.
Oh yeah, and then there’s a lame B-story with James’ son, Trey (Eshaya Draper) a genius with a genius pig.
Laughing yet?
Yes Roger Kumble, director of such lame films as The Sweetest Thing and Cruel Intentions 2 has concocted a film, which rips off every Chevy Chase movie ever made…but without the spirit. This film should have gone Direct to…
…Garbage.
Then again, perhaps I am being too hard on the creatives. After all, it is a family film.
So I asked my daughters Chloe and Max what they thought. They hated it, too.
That’s my girls!
One Ball Point Pen
Runtime:
1 hr. 24 min.
Rating:
PG-13 violence, terror and disturbing images
Cast:
Lizzy Caplan, Jessica Lucas, T.J. Miller, Michael Stahl-David, Mike Vogel,
Odette Yustman
Director:
Matt Reeves
Genres:
Sci-Fi Disaster Film, Monster Film, Science Fiction, Sci-Fi Horror
Damn.
A film that actually lived up to its hype.
I just came back from J.J. Abrams’ production of Cloverfield, and I am here to tell you it takes everything we know about the giant monster attacking NYC genre and turns it on its scaly head. It is a scary, fun and surprisingly fresh rollercoaster ride.
For months now, the film has been the subject of intense Internet scrutiny? Is the title really Cloverfield? How could they do a trailer without a title? Omg will the guy yelling “Ohmigod” at the Statue of Liberty’s head please shut up? Is this the monster? Is it Godzilla? Voltron?
Yes 6 months of that. Thank god it’s over.
I remember my reaction to the trailer - “Oh look a bunch of CW kids getting ready to be eaten and stomped on by something. Good.” I was actually stunned that I found myself caring about each and every one of them.
It’s springtime in NYC. Rob, played by Michael Stahl-David, is about to leave for Japan to take a lucrative job. He comes to a surprise going away party thrown by his brother Jason (Mike Vogel) and his girlfriend Lily (Jessica Lucas). Also there is Rob’s ex Beth (Odette Yustman). Beth and Rob really love each other, but it seems like the Japan gig is getting in their way. Big time. And there to document it all on his digi-recorder is Rob’s best friend Hudson Platt, played by T.J. Miller. Rob decides to use this party as a chance to get things off his chest with Beth.
Yawn.
We’ve seen this angst before…on Smallville, The O.C. to name a few. You know the drill - lots of cool conversation and slang thrown around by beautiful 20-somethings.
“Dude, you know you really love her.”
“How could you come here with him?”
Yawn.
Then BOOM!
Something harsh, mean and brutal rocks their party. Scared Rob and the other revelers go outside on the roof…then the street. Of course that part we’ve seen on over and over again in trailers and on the net – the skyscraper in the distance exploding…the panic…The Statue of Liberty’s head rolling up the street.
What you haven’t seen is the rest. Which quite frankly is a terror trek as Rob and his friends try to escape New York from a creature unlike anything you’ve ever seen before.
And unlike our angst-ridden 20-somethings, this creature has no conscience. No guilt. It’s just there to destroy.
Oh and by the way, this monster, which is as tall as the Empire State Building, is not a giant lizard. It has a tail, but it ain’t no lizard. And it’s brought party favors – crab-like creatures, which drop off of its body, and eats anything in site.
An allegory of course to 9/11 (it was once rumored that this would be called 01/18/08) Cloverfield works because it isn’t about a giant monster wrecking havoc on New York. It’s not about the heroes who go off to fight it. There’s no scientist, working in a local high school, with the answer to the problem. Cloverfield is about people like you and me. Okay check that, it’s about very attractive people (ha) trying to survive while New York crumbles around them.
They are scared and they don’t have answers. Which leaves us scared and without answers. Filmed of course as the Blair Witch Project’s cousin (all on government owned video), Cloverfield puts us right in the middle of the melee. We feel Rob and company’s surprise when they turn a corner and there’s the creature! Run. Oh shit there’s the army! Run. There is an immediacy this technique brings the film.
Particularly terrifying is a trip through the subway tunnels and how they rescue Beth.
I also really loved the fact that there is no explanation for the creature’s existence. We don’t know where it came from and or where it’s going back to. I do know this though. I am going back…for a second and third viewing.
Would Cloverfield have been as scary if it were shot like, for lack of a better term, a normal movie? Probably not. The realism of the camcorder puts us right in the center of the maelstrom. The camera work and the lighting also conceal the creature, which makes it far scarier. And the lack of a musical score really adds to the realism. Some will hate Cloverfield for its experimental filmmaking. Yes, the haters are already coming out in droves. I fall in the former. Director Matt Reeves has done a bang up job with getting actual performances that feel like how people would really react out of his actors.
In a day where audiences are jaded and feel like they have seen it all, Cloverfield reinvents the genre. It’s the kind of movie I wish I could write.
FOUR BALL POINT PENS.
Run Time: 2 hr. 4 min.
Rating: PG – Strong Language,
nudity, drug usage, some violence
Cast: Nicolas Cage, Diane
Kruger, Jon Voight, Justin Bartha, Ed Harris, Helen Mirren, Harvey Keitel,
Bruce Greenwood
Director: Jon Turtletaub
Genre: Adventure, Family, Suspense,
Caper
There is a lot one can learn from Jon Turtletaub’s sequel to
the surprise hit of 2003.
No I’m not speaking about brief historical lessons.
After seeing National Treasure:
Book of Secrets, I came away with new
relationship knowledge. Go figure.
For instance if you and your
significant other are having problems, and perhaps one of you has moved out of
your multi-million dollar mansion…
Go on a treasure hunt.
Or
If you haven’t spoken to your
wife, and mother of your famous son, for 32 years…
Go on a treasure hunt.
If your family has been defamed
and has estranged you…let’s say it all together.
Go on a treasure hunt.
It will make it all better.
Those are about the only lessons
to be gained from this brainless popcorn flick about globetrotting brains on a
treasure hunt.
How National Treasure became a hit is still mind-boggling to me. It certainly
was watchable, but I found it a tad boring…even with all the action. My
11-year-old loves it. I asked her why? She could only say she did. Well she
wasn’t alone. National Treasure went on
to gross over 300 million worldwide.
National Treasure: Book of
Secrets continues the trend of being the
poor man’s Raiders of the Lost Ark. We
meet Ben Franklin Gates (Cage) when he is giving a lecture on his grandfather’s
role in the Lincoln cabinet. “Not so fast so,” says Oscar Winner Ed Harris, who
plays Mitch Wilkinson. Mitch claims that he has a page of John Wilkes Booth’s
diary that proves Gates’ great great grandpappy was the orchestrator of
Lincoln’s assassination.
Ben, along with his dad (John
Voight), estranged girlfriend Abigail (Kruger) and former assistant, turned
unsuccessful author; Riley (Justin Bartha) set out to prove it’s a fake. The
mystery takes them from the third (I didn’t know there were three) Statue of
Liberty in Paris to Buckingham Palace to the White House itself. In between,
there are the pre-requisite car chases, clobbering of Jon Voight and of course,
villain Harris scowling.
Their research leads Ben and co.
to a book that is for Presidents’ eyes only. So how does Ben decide he’s going
to get a gander? Why kidnap the president of course. Eventually the clues lead Ben and co. along with evil Mitch
to Mount Rushmore, which may or may not hide the biggest treasure in American
history.
As in the first one, NTBOS mixes historical fact with a whole heap of fiction and
then presents its characters in one preposterous situation after another. I’m
certainly not against the premise, but again something is missing from this
popcorn flick for me. I can’t accuse it of running on autopilot. Cage genuinely
looks like he’s having a good time, as does Bartha. Kruger is pretty to look
at, but still comes across pretty cold as well.
I think the fault lies in
Turtletaub’s direction. The pacing seems off and the film feels like it could
be 20 minutes shorter. The ending drags. And I felt Harris wasn’t convincing as
a baddie this time. There was certainly more tension between Cage and Harris
when they faced off against each other in Michael Bay’s The Rock. Cage and Kruger seem to lack chemistry as well. The
reason they broke up came across convoluted. It couldn’t have been that serious
if all it took was an adventure to bring them back together.
One thing to note is Ben’s mother’s
(Helen Mirren) breasts. Have to admit when she was stuck in a cave with Voight
and the two of them tumbled to the ground, I found myself thinking, “Wow for an
older woman she has great boobs.” My wife would probably say it’s the bra.
However as outstanding as her
breasts are, it’s not enough to recommend this National Treasure…unless you are having trouble with your spouse. If you
are…
Go on a treasure hunt.
Two Ball Point Pens.
Run Time: 1 hr. 37 min.
Rating: R – Strong Language,
nudity, drug usage, some violence
Cast: Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts,
Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, Ned Beatty
Director: Mike Nichols
Genre: Political Drama,
Docudrama, Drama
God Julia Roberts is looking horsier than ever. Especially
on the big screen! Okay I just wanted to get that out of the way.
The first review out of my holiday movie marathon is Mike
Nichols’ Charlie Wilson’s War. This is
an unexpected gem of a movie with a particularly strong acting from Tom Hanks
and Peter Scolari…kidding. I love throwing a Bosom Buddies reference in there. Actually Hanks is joined by a
nominee-worthy performance – in my opinion – from Philip Seymour Hoffman.
Charlie Wilson (Hanks) is a boozing, womanizing Senator from
Texas whose biggest achievement is getting re-elected five times and collecting
a huge amount of IOU’s from various senators and interest groups. Playboy
playmates and strippers who basically double as secretaries surround him
Charlie is persuaded by Julia (thank god she doesn’t do that
horrible laugh) Roberts’ Joanne Herring, who is the sixth richest woman in his
district, to look into the Soviet Union’s brutal attacks in Afghanistan. After
a trip to the war-torn country, Charlie comes back convinced he has to do
something. He gets the help he needs in the form of Philip Seymour Hoffman’s
Gust Avrakotos, a CIA operative who is bitter for
being overlooked for a promotion.
Together, the two set out to help
the Afghan rebels fend off the Soviet Army by supplying them with weapons and
training. Although successful,
Wilson predicts, and rightly so, a deadly scenario once the US pulls out –
events that will lead to the rise of The Taliban and Osama bin Laden.
Um, what else can I say? This is a
movie designed to win Oscars. Although entertaining and paced well, there is
somewhat of a letdown. This happens sometimes when a film is loaded with star
power. The performances are all top notch…yes even Julia Roberts is good. But
then again she isn’t seen that much so maybe that’s why! Tom Hanks is likable as the playboy
senator and his scenes with Hoffman are both endearing and sometimes comical.
The introduction of the two characters to each other is memorable and fun.
The last scene is what really got
me in Charlie Wilson’s War. The
chilling and ominous speech by Hanks to his sub-committee is worth the hour and
37 minutes alone. Amy Adams,
coming off a winning performance in Enchanted, is also great as the senator’s aide. Plus special thanks
goes out to the DP for capturing her ass in a long walk down!
The pace is quick and the
dialogue, penned by Aaron Sorkin, is quite good. He avoids letting this
material become too dry, which is what can happen in these sorts of docudramas.
That is probably due to he and Nichols using broad strokes from George Criles’
autobiography of Charlie Wilson. The score, by James Newton Howard, is also
worth noting.
With so many films today running
on autopilot, it is easy to forget a well-written movie. And Charlie
Wilson’s War has it all – drama, suspense
and humor.
And most of all, not that much
Julia Roberts!
Three Ball and a half Point Pens.